Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchoofs, Allisonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-15T15:24:49Z
dc.date.available2007-05-15T15:24:49Z
dc.date.issued1997-04-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/975
dc.description.abstractA first experiment (experiment 1) investigated the effect of cropping systems involving annual forages on the density of weed seeds in the seedbank, density of weed seedlings in a subsequent pea crop, and species composition of weed communities. The 11 treatments for experiment 1 were as follows: wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Katepwa) sprayed with grass and broadleaf herbicide, harvested for grain; wheat sprayed with broadleaf herbicide only, harvested for grain; wheat, unsprayed, harvested for grain; winter triticale (Triticosecale cv. Pika), simulation grazed; spring triticale (cv. Banjo), cut for silage; winter and spring triticale intercrop, cut for silage then simulation grazed; sorghum sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench X Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf., common), cut for hay; non-dormant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. cv. Nitro), cut for hay; weed fallow, cut for silage, sweet clover (Melilotus officinales L. cv. Norgold)/triticale doublecrop, cut for hay then simulation grazed; and fall rye, harvested for grain. A second experiment (experiment 2) investigated the effect of selected forage systems on weed density under conventional and zero tillage. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)en_US
dc.format.extent9482425 bytes
dc.format.extent184 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleThe role of annual forages in integrated weed managementen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
dc.degree.disciplinePlant Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record