Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisor Vorauer,Jacquie (Psychology) en_US
dc.contributor.author Sakamoto, Yumiko
dc.date.accessioned 2011-09-13T22:37:50Z
dc.date.available 2011-09-13T22:37:50Z
dc.date.issued 2011-09-13
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4915
dc.description.abstract Intergroup contact is often awkward, due to individuals’ concerns regarding outgroup members' evaluation of them, and these concerns are higher when the evaluation is perceived as uncertain and important (Vorauer, 2006). Although high evaluative concern has been identified as one of the key obstacles to smooth intergroup relations, many questions remain about the nature of evaluative concern and how it might be reduced. Three studies examined evaluative uncertainty- which has been theorized to be one of the main predictors of evaluative concerns during intergroup contact with an ostensible interaction paradigm. The key goals of this research were to: 1) develop and assess different potential measures of evaluative uncertainty, 2) investigate whether evaluative uncertainty is higher during intergroup contact than during intragroup contact and whether it fosters evaluative concerns, and 3) identify a strategy for reducing evaluative uncertainty. Study 1 followed a 2 (Participant Group Status: Majority vs. Minority) x 2 (Contact Type: Intergroup vs. Intragroup) factorial design and two promising measures of evaluative uncertainty were identified. In line with predictions, higher evaluative uncertainty was observed for both majority and minority group members during intergroup as compared to intragroup contact. Study 2 followed a 2 (Uncertainty Manipulation: Uncertainty vs. Certainty) x 2 (Contact Type: Intergroup vs. Intragroup) factorial design, using a modified version of a manipulation developed in previous research to manipulate general uncertainty. Unfortunately, however, the manipulation was not successful. Study 3 examined whether evaluative uncertainty can be reduced by prompting individuals to reflect on how their traits are usually perceived by others, and whether this reduced uncertainty can then lead to improved contact experiences. The study followed a 2 (General Meta-Evaluation Activation: Yes vs. No) x 2 (Participant Ethnicity: White vs. Chinese) x 2 (Contact Type: Intergroup vs. Intragroup) factorial design. As hypothesized, prompting individuals to reflect on how their traits are usually perceived by others led to reduced evaluative uncertainty and more positive interaction behavior (i.e., increased self-disclosure, more communication effort, and increased interaction enjoyment – the latter only in White participants). en_US
dc.subject Intergroup en_US
dc.subject Evaluative concerns en_US
dc.title Does she hate me? or does she like me? evaluative uncertainty during intergroup contact en_US
dc.degree.discipline Psychology en_US
dc.contributor.examiningcommittee Cameron, Jessica (Psychology) Starzyk, Katherine (Psychology) Senehi, Jessica (Peace and Conflict Studies) Shelton, Nicole (Princeton University) en_US
dc.degree.level Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) en_US
dc.description.note October 2011 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics