Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodridge, Donna
dc.contributor.authorRana, Masud
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Elizabeth L
dc.contributor.authorRotter, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorDobson, Roy
dc.contributor.authorGroot, Gary
dc.contributor.authorUdod, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T04:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-03
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2018 Apr 03;18(1):237
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3045-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/33012
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Beginning in 2012, Lean was introduced to improve health care quality and promote patient-centredness throughout the province of Saskatchewan, Canada with the aim of producing coordinated, system-wide change. Significant investments have been made in training and implementation, although limited evaluation of the outcomes have been reported. In order to better understand the complex influences that make innovations such as Lean “workable” in practice, Normalization Process Theory guided this study. The objectives of the study were to: a) evaluate the implementation processes associated with Lean implementation in the Saskatchewan health care system from the perspectives of health care professionals; and b) identify demographic, training and role variables associated with normalization of Lean. Methods Licensed health care professionals were invited through their professional associations to complete a cross-sectional, modified, online version of the NoMAD questionnaire in March, 2016. Analysis was based on 1032 completed surveys. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted. Multivariate multinomial regressions were used to quantify the associations between five NoMAD items representing the four Normalization Process Theory constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring). Results More than 75% of respondents indicated that neither sufficient training nor resources (collective action) had been made available to them for the implementation of Lean. Compared to other providers, nurses were more likely to report that Lean increased their workload. Significant differences in responses were evident between: leaders vs. direct care providers; nurses vs. other health professionals; and providers who reported increased workload as a result of Lean vs. those who did not. There were no associations between responses to normalization construct proxy items and: completion of introductory Lean training; participation in Lean activities; age group; years of professional experience; or employment status (full-time or part-time). Lean leader training was positively associated with proxy items reflecting coherence, cognitive participation and reflexive monitoring. Conclusions From the perspectives of the cross-section of health care professionals responding to this survey, major gaps remain in embedding Lean into healthcare. Strategies that address the challenges faced by nurses and direct care providers, in particular, are needed if intended goals are to be achieved.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleAssessing the implementation processes of a large-scale, multi-year quality improvement initiative: survey of health care providers
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2018-05-01T04:32:12Z
local.author.affiliationRady Faculty of Health Sciencesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record