Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bradley, Stephanie en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-05-18T20:02:46Z
dc.date.available 2007-05-18T20:02:46Z
dc.date.issued 2000-05-01T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/1898
dc.description.abstract Liberal thought is embroiled in an endless philosophical debate. This debate is precipitated by inherent tensions in liberalism that appears to be irreconcilable with its end of individual freedom. The two main contenders in the debate are the "classic" and "progressive" liberals. The point of philosophical tension between the two groups is in regards to the proper parameters of government. The "classic" liberals argue that the government in a liberal state must be limited, while the "progressive" liberals assert the need for government intervention in the economy as a means of creating an even playing field for all individuals. The underpinnings of the debate are present in the initial liberal discourse and writing and have grown in scope in the twentieth century, culminating in a wealth of literature and the birth of liberal criticism. Liberal critics have had a significant impact on the interpretation and accept nce of liberalism as a useful political theory. They argue that liberalism is unable to meet its end of individual freedom, in either its "classic" or "progressive" forms. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) en_US
dc.format.extent 4301703 bytes
dc.format.extent 184 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.language en en_US
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.title Philosophical tensions in the liberal tradition, constraints on the good life en_US
dc.degree.discipline Political Studies en_US
dc.degree.level Master of Arts (M.A.) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics