Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wittman, Karen. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-05-18T12:12:08Z
dc.date.available 2007-05-18T12:12:08Z
dc.date.issued 1997-05-01T00:00:00Z en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1993/1555
dc.description.abstract Despite the recent outpouring of literature on the subject of security and the virtual avalanche of calls to have the term rethought, redefined, renegotiated and enlarged, very little of this presents an improvement over past practice. This is particularly the case with demands to have security re-written to include the environment. When cast against the backdrop of the critical literature, it becomes clear that these proposals will do little to ameliorate past problems. Instead, they remain as riddled with difficulty as the original concept itself. As fundamentally important as it is to maintain an open dialogue between mainstream analysts, those who critique the hegemonic discourse and those who ttempt to craft alternatives, it is equally significant to realize that not every alternative is necessarily preferable. Thus, efforts toward redefining security should proceed with caution. Considering the pressing gravity of both environmental and security issues, the dialogue should nonetheless be maintained and conscientious efforts to continue to improve both spheres upheld. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) en_US
dc.format.extent 10193466 bytes
dc.format.extent 184 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.language en en_US
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.title The environment and security, an examination of proposals to redefine security en_US
dc.degree.discipline Political Studies en_US
dc.degree.level Master of Arts (M.A.) en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

View Statistics