MSpace will be unavailable on Sunday Jan 29, 2023 between the times of 8:00AM CST and 12:00PM CST. Please plan your submissions accordingly.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReich, Shanien_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-15T19:05:12Z
dc.date.available2007-05-15T19:05:12Z
dc.date.issued1998-08-30T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/1193
dc.description.abstractThis practicum report explores the mediation of eight cases: seven victim/offender cases involving minor assaults and one threatening bodily harm. Four measures were evaluated: impact of face-to-face mediation, writing an agreement, fulfillment of restitution, and learning objectives. The focus was to determine whether mediation restored communication between disputants. Anger halted proper communication and resolution of the incident in all cases. All parties were acquaintances and conflicts were incident-based. The mediation was based on a restorative paradigm. Restorative justice maintains that four parties are affected by criminal behaviour: victim, offender, community, and government. It emphasizes that the goal of the criminal justice system is to assist all parties in reaching resolution. Resolution therefore requires that the victim receive reparation for injuries and the offender assume responsibility for the crime. Initial screening for potential mediations was done in private information court. Out of a number of cases (not documented) thought appropriate by the Crown for mediation eight cases proceeded to mediation; a written agreement was reached in three cases and a verbal agreement in two cases. The mediation process followed the model of introduction, issue identification, discussion, and agreement. Variation in the model existed when case development and mediation were done in the same evening. The State Anger Scale (SAS) was utilized. Results of the pretest and posttest indicated that seven out of eight of the complainants and three out of eight of the accused were less irritated after the mediation. Tabulated results are outlined for eight cases and recommendations for future mediation work are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent9249428 bytes
dc.format.extent184 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleMediating minor assault casesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
dc.degree.disciplineSocial Worken_US
dc.degree.levelMaster of Social Work (M.S.W.)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record