MSpace - DSpace at UofM >
Faculty of Graduate Studies (Electronic Theses and Dissertations) >
FGS - Electronic Theses & Dissertations (Public) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Attenuating desirable responding: a comparison of self-compassion and self-affirmation strategies
Authors: O'Brien, Karen Angela
Supervisor: Johnson, Edward (Psychology)
Examining Committee: Ellery, Michael (Psychology), Sexton, Lorne (Clinical Health Psychology)
Graduation Date: October 2011
Keywords: self-compassion
Issue Date: 10-Sep-2011
Abstract: Research has shown that desirable responding can be detrimental to social relationships, achievement and health. This study used an experimental design to (a) induce an increase in desirable responding through threat to self-image and then (b) compare the effectiveness of self-compassionate and self-affirming writing in attenuating that increase. Control groups included no threat exposure, threat exposure alone and threat exposure plus neutral writing. Desirable responding was measured along two dimensions: self-enhancement and exaggerated virtue. Results show the threat did not result in the predicted increase in desirable responding so the effectiveness of the two strategies with regards to attenuating increases in desirable responding could not be examined and compared. However, results do reveal a difference in the mechanism of these two strategies. Engaging in self-compassionate writing resulted in a significant decrease in exaggerated virtue whereas being self-affirmed resulted in a significant increase, suggesting a possible benefit of a self-compassion strategy.
Appears in Collection(s):FGS - Electronic Theses & Dissertations (Public)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
O'Brien_Karen.pdf448.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in MSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! MSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback